Blog
← Back
AIAutomationWorkflowsAI Agentsn8nLangChainClaudeDevelopment

Set Workflows vs. Agentic Execution: Two Paths to AI Automation

The AI landscape today offers two fundamentally different approaches to building intelligent automation: set workflows and agentic execution. Understanding these paradigms is crucial for choosing the right tool for your needs, whether you're a business user looking to automate processes or a developer building advanced AI systems.

What Are Set Workflows?

Set workflows represent a predetermined, visual approach to automation where users design explicit step-by-step processes in advance. Think of it as creating a detailed roadmap that the system must follow exactly.

  • n8n: Open-source workflow automation tool with visual interface
  • Make (formerly Integromat): No-code automation platform
  • LangChain: Developer framework for chaining LLM operations
  • LangGraph: Extension of LangChain for creating stateful, multi-agent workflows
  • LangSmith: Debugging and monitoring platform for LLM applications

How Set Workflows Work:

In a set workflow system, you:

  1. Design the flow visually: Connect nodes representing different actions (API calls, data transformations, LLM prompts)
  2. Define conditions: Set explicit if-then rules for branching logic
  3. Configure each step: Specify exact parameters, inputs, and outputs
  4. Test the flow: Run through scenarios to ensure it behaves as expected
  5. Deploy: The system executes exactly what you've programmed

Think of it as visual programming for automation. You're essentially creating a flowchart that the system follows religiously.

Example Use Case:

Imagine you want to process incoming customer emails:

Email arrives → Extract key info → Check sentiment →
If positive → Send to sales team
If negative → Create support ticket → Notify manager

You would design this entire flow in advance, connecting each step explicitly.

What Is Agentic Execution?

Agentic execution represents a goal-oriented, autonomous approach where you give an AI agent a mission and trust it to figure out the best path to accomplish it.

  • Anthropic's Claude: Advanced AI with tool use capabilities
  • Claude Code: AI coding assistant with autonomous problem-solving
  • Codex by OpenAI: AI system for code generation and task completion
  • Gemini CLI: Google's command-line AI agent interface
  • TeamDay.ai: Platform for creating and deploying custom AI agents

How Agentic Execution Works:

In an agentic system, you:

  1. Define the goal: Tell the agent what you want to achieve
  2. Provide tools: Give it access to APIs, databases, file systems, etc.
  3. Set constraints: Define boundaries and safety parameters
  4. Let it run: The agent autonomously decides how to reach the goal
  5. Review results: Check the outcome and provide feedback for improvement

Think of it as hiring a smart assistant who understands your goal and figures out the best way to achieve it, adapting on the fly.

Example Use Case:

For the same email processing scenario:

Prompt: "Handle incoming customer emails appropriately based on their content and sentiment"

The agent then:
- Reads the email
- Analyzes sentiment and intent
- Decides whether it needs more information
- Routes to the appropriate team
- Follows up if needed
- Adapts its approach based on results

The key difference: you didn't specify the exact steps. The agent figured them out.

Set Workflows: Pros and Cons

Pros:

✅ Predictable: Executes exactly as designed every time ✅ Debuggable: Easy to trace where things go wrong ✅ Visual: No-code interface accessible to non-developers ✅ Version control: Clear tracking of workflow changes ✅ Cost predictable: You know exactly how many API calls will be made ✅ Compliance-friendly: Easier to audit and ensure regulatory compliance ✅ Lower operational costs: Typically fewer API calls since paths are predetermined

Cons:

❌ Rigid: Can't adapt to unexpected scenarios ❌ Manual updates required: Must redesign workflows for new use cases ❌ Complex flows become unwieldy: Large workflows are hard to manage visually ❌ Limited intelligence: Can only handle scenarios you've programmed ❌ Maintenance burden: Every edge case requires explicit handling ❌ Slower to build complex logic: Intricate decision trees take time to design

Ideal For:

  • Business process automation
  • No-code users and citizen developers
  • Scenarios requiring strict compliance and auditability
  • Repetitive tasks with well-defined paths
  • Teams that need transparency in automation logic

Agentic Execution: Pros and Cons

Pros:

✅ Adaptive: Handles unexpected scenarios without reprogramming ✅ Faster development: Describe what you want, not how to do it ✅ Intelligent: Can reason about complex situations ✅ Self-improving: Learns from feedback and experience ✅ Flexible: Works with ambiguous or changing requirements ✅ Handles edge cases: Can reason through scenarios you didn't anticipate

Cons:

❌ Less predictable: May take different approaches to the same problem ❌ Harder to debug: Understanding why it made certain decisions can be challenging ❌ Requires oversight: Need to monitor for unexpected behaviors ❌ Higher costs: May use more API calls exploring solutions ❌ Black box concerns: Decision-making process can be opaque ❌ Requires AI literacy: Understanding how to prompt and constrain agents

Ideal For:

  • Developers and tech-savvy users
  • Complex problem-solving requiring reasoning
  • Research and exploration tasks
  • Scenarios with high variability
  • Tasks requiring creative solutions
  • Rapid prototyping and experimentation

Key Limitations to Consider

Set Workflows Limitations:

  1. Scalability of complexity: As workflows grow, they become exponentially harder to manage
  2. Context limitations: Difficult to maintain context across long, complex flows
  3. Innovation ceiling: Limited by the designer's imagination and foresight
  4. Integration overhead: Each new tool or API requires manual integration and configuration

Agentic Execution Limitations:

  1. Cost variability: Hard to predict exact costs for complex tasks
  2. Reliability concerns: May occasionally produce unexpected results
  3. Security considerations: Autonomous agents need careful sandboxing
  4. Explainability: Harder to explain decisions to stakeholders or auditors
  5. Training required: Teams need to learn prompt engineering and agent management

The Convergence: OpenAI's Agent Builder

Interestingly, the lines are blurring. OpenAI's Agent Builder represents a hybrid approach—a no-code platform for creating agentic systems. This democratizes agentic execution for non-technical users, offering:

  • Visual interface for configuring agents
  • Pre-built capabilities and tool integrations
  • Simplified prompt engineering
  • Guardrails and safety controls

This trend suggests the future may not be "workflows vs. agents" but rather "workflows AND agents" working together.

Which Approach Should You Choose?

Choose Set Workflows When:

  • You need predictable, repeatable processes
  • Compliance and auditability are critical
  • Your team consists mainly of non-developers
  • You have well-defined business processes to automate
  • Cost predictability is important
  • You're automating high-volume, low-variation tasks

Choose Agentic Execution When:

  • You need adaptive, intelligent decision-making
  • Your team is technically sophisticated
  • The problem requires reasoning and creativity
  • You're building research or exploration tools
  • Requirements are ambiguous or evolving
  • You want to prototype quickly without detailed planning

Consider a Hybrid Approach When:

  • You have both structured and unstructured processes
  • Some tasks need predictability, others need flexibility
  • You want guardrails around autonomous agents
  • You're building enterprise solutions that need both control and intelligence

The Future of AI Automation

The distinction between these approaches is likely to soften over time:

  1. Workflow tools will add intelligence: Platforms like n8n and Make are already incorporating AI decision nodes
  2. Agent platforms will add structure: Agentic systems will offer more control and predictability options
  3. Hybrid platforms will emerge: New tools that seamlessly blend both approaches
  4. Specialization will increase: Some tools will focus on specific industries or use cases

Getting Started

For Set Workflows:

  1. Start with n8n (free, open-source, great community)
  2. Map out your process on paper first
  3. Build incrementally, testing each node
  4. Use version control for your workflows

For Agentic Execution:

  1. Experiment with Claude or ChatGPT to understand agent behavior
  2. Start with well-defined goals and gradually increase complexity
  3. Build robust monitoring and logging
  4. Develop clear prompts and tool descriptions
  5. Consider platforms like TeamDay.ai for team-wide agent deployment

Conclusion

Both set workflows and agentic execution have their place in the AI automation ecosystem. Set workflows excel at predictable, auditable automation for business processes, while agentic execution shines in adaptive, intelligent problem-solving for technical teams.

The key is understanding your needs:

  • Control vs. flexibility
  • Predictability vs. adaptability
  • No-code accessibility vs. technical sophistication
  • Cost predictability vs. intelligent optimization

As AI technology matures, we'll likely see more tools that offer the best of both worlds—the structure and transparency of workflows combined with the intelligence and adaptability of agents.

The future of AI automation isn't about choosing one approach over the other—it's about knowing when to use each and how to combine them effectively.

Ready to explore AI agents for your team? TeamDay.ai offers a platform for creating, deploying, and managing custom AI agents that can integrate into your workflows while maintaining the flexibility of agentic execution.